|
|
Post by El Sid on Sept 19, 2023 11:25:41 GMT
Since you ask, (quite a bit closer than your's) here's the flies foot  House fly foot by Mike Kanssen, on Flickr Mind you I couldn't have got that close with a live fly, and your shot is a more pleasing image... To be honest my fly had clearly been dead sometime, bit's kept falling off it...  |
|
|
|
Post by dorsetmike on Sept 19, 2023 11:34:03 GMT
Must have been DorsetMike, probably just 'filters' which I spiced up a bit.
Not guilty, can't remember using any filters either.
|
|
|
|
Post by zx9 on Sept 19, 2023 11:49:42 GMT
Must have been DorsetMike, probably just 'filters' which I spiced up a bit.
Not guilty, can't remember using any filters either.
So it must have been one of my cats that told me to do it, or it could have come from a list of previous other forum contests and themes. |
|
|
|
Post by peterob on Sept 19, 2023 16:07:24 GMT
I was thinking on heavily processed images though I suppose the modifications on this one are not strictly by filters but using the auto-mask (subject -> invert) which is in the same Lightroom menu as the linear and radial gradient filters. It was for a theme on APForum on low-key so I took a very dark subject and made the whole picture very dark. Selective filtering as it were. First - possibly the only - "creative" editing I was able to do because I could imagine the outcome somewhat. You have all seen it before so maybe I should have left it. Anyway - now I've found the pics and done the typing. Before:  BV9R0093.jpg by Pete, on Flickr After:  BV9R0093.jpg by Pete, on Flickr |
|
|
|
Post by petrochemist on Sept 19, 2023 17:11:30 GMT
Must have been DorsetMike, probably just 'filters' which I spiced up a bit. I've just checked through the list I forwarded to you back in Feb. It did have 'Digital filters' at one point near the end & specifically ND filters at another... Doesn't seem to be anything with generic filters, if you need someone to blame, you can say I lead you astray, with those...  But I think the widened alternative is something you deserve all the credit for. |
|
|
|
Post by Bipolar on Sept 19, 2023 18:55:58 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by zx9 on Sept 19, 2023 20:34:20 GMT
Must have been DorsetMike, probably just 'filters' which I spiced up a bit. I've just checked through the list I forwarded to you back in Feb. It did have 'Digital filters' at one point near the end & specifically ND filters at another... Doesn't seem to be anything with generic filters, if you need someone to blame, you can say I lead you astray, with those... But I think the widened alternative is something you deserve all the credit for. Almost certain now that it was one of my cats. At least they are real and visible unlike the whippet I had which was both invisible and very badly behaved, especially at parties. |
|
|
|
Post by kate on Sept 20, 2023 6:21:05 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by petrochemist on Sept 20, 2023 7:11:28 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by kate on Sept 20, 2023 7:37:15 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by kate on Sept 20, 2023 7:42:12 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by zx9 on Sept 20, 2023 8:07:27 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by zx9 on Sept 20, 2023 8:09:27 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by peterob on Sept 20, 2023 8:09:36 GMT
The only picture I can think of that fits the bill is this one from 2007. I made it mono - possibly if we had a "minimalist" theme on APForum, which does seem likely because they are both in my Flickr AP folder. I'll give both mono and colour versions.  IMG_0043.jpg by Pete, on Flickr  IMG_0043.jpg by Pete, on Flickr |
|
|
|
Post by zx9 on Sept 20, 2023 8:17:09 GMT
|
|
