|
|
Post by dans on Jun 26, 2024 14:48:04 GMT
There is a lot here that doesn't fit the how a photo should work, any thoughts?
|
|
|
|
Post by peterob on Jun 26, 2024 15:22:15 GMT
For me I'd try to get square so that both main subjects are in focus and include the top of the grass stem. Colours are delightful.
|
|
|
|
Post by dans on Jun 26, 2024 18:20:15 GMT
For me I'd try to get square so that both main subjects are in focus and include the top of the grass stem. Colours are delightful. Thanks Pete |
|
|
|
Post by El Sid on Jun 27, 2024 11:32:08 GMT
Building on Pete's comment I'd say that either both subjects need to be in focus or one needs to be significantly out of focus. Also my reaction to the stem on the right was 'Pity the top's missing'... Problem is it looks accidental rather than, as I suspect, deliberate. Colours are great though.  |
|
|
|
Post by dans on Jun 27, 2024 15:27:35 GMT
Building on Pete's comment I'd say that either both subjects need to be in focus or one needs to be significantly out of focus. Also my reaction to the stem on the right was 'Pity the top's missing'... Problem is it looks accidental rather than, as I suspect, deliberate. Colours are great though. Thanks. I suppose it is accidental in that I didn't see it when I took the photo, but was happy with it because it felt like it showed the nature of the field a bit. But I get that it can look like I missed something, which I did 😁 And I totally get the point about not being in focus. |
|
|
|
Post by peterob on Jun 27, 2024 15:33:31 GMT
Building on Pete's comment I'd say that either both subjects need to be in focus or one needs to be significantly out of focus. Also my reaction to the stem on the right was 'Pity the top's missing'... Problem is it looks accidental rather than, as I suspect, deliberate. Colours are great though. Thanks. I suppose it is accidental in that I didn't see it when I took the photo, but was happy with it because it felt like it showed the nature of the field a bit. But I get that it can look like I missed something, which I did 😁 And I totally get the point about not being in focus. For me it is more the "nearly but not quite in focus" rather than out of focus per se. An alternative composition would have been to have the left hand side grass more out of focus. |
|
|
|
Post by dans on Jun 28, 2024 11:41:06 GMT
Thanks. I suppose it is accidental in that I didn't see it when I took the photo, but was happy with it because it felt like it showed the nature of the field a bit. But I get that it can look like I missed something, which I did 😁 And I totally get the point about not being in focus. For me it is more the "nearly but not quite in focus" rather than out of focus per se. An alternative composition would have been to have the left hand side grass more out of focus. Yeah, that does make sense, thanks Pete. |
|
