|
|
Post by mick on Jan 10, 2023 8:18:57 GMT
"Boo hoo, woe is me, the media are too intrusive." Says man to the media he invited to hear him talk. The only interest I have in this is a sweepstake on when the palace finally admit Charles isn't the father and cut him loose for good. I had a friend (now deceased) who was, shall we say, extremely well connected. Her post code began P35 (google it!) She claimed that she knew with certainty that Charles was the father.
Mick
|
|
|
|
Post by MJB on Jan 10, 2023 8:53:52 GMT
I thought and think that making the two boys walk the walk at their mother's funeral was child abuse. Who's fault was that? From what I recall at the time the royal family weren't going to give her a state funeral. It was the British media and those amongst the general public who beatified her, that clamoured for the funeral to be what it was. The house of Windsor were damned if they did, damned if they didn't. |
|
|
|
Post by davem399 on Jan 10, 2023 12:36:13 GMT
It seems that whenever a royal gets involved with an American, it doesn’t go well. Thinking of Edward VIII, Andrew, and now Harry.
|
|
|
|
Post by donerundlecams on Jan 10, 2023 23:57:19 GMT
According to the news over here, the book has sold out quicker than the other Harry book  ........  Cheers, Jack .........personally, i'm with Zou, tis a money grab and hates the media, but, the first place he goes |
|
|
|
Post by Kath on Jan 11, 2023 14:08:19 GMT
"Boo hoo, woe is me, the media are too intrusive." Says man to the media he invited to hear him talk. The only interest I have in this is a sweepstake on when the palace finally admit Charles isn't the father and cut him loose for good. Charles and Harry both have the same eyes - practically touching their noses. Not sure I'd bet on paternity being denied. |
|
|
|
Post by MJB on Jan 11, 2023 17:35:41 GMT
"Boo hoo, woe is me, the media are too intrusive." Says man to the media he invited to hear him talk. The only interest I have in this is a sweepstake on when the palace finally admit Charles isn't the father and cut him loose for good. Charles and Harry both have the same eyes - practically touching their noses. Not sure I'd bet on paternity being denied. I agree. I saw a photo of Charles and Harry stood next to each other and they look exceedingly similar. |
|
|
|
Post by willien on Jan 11, 2023 18:45:19 GMT
I have heard it said Harry looks like a young Prince Phillip, certainly the hairstyle is developing.
|
|
|
|
Post by zou on Jan 11, 2023 18:48:39 GMT
I heard he looks like an aunt, but I may have misheard that.
|
|
|
|
Post by steveandthedogs on Jan 11, 2023 21:06:36 GMT
Listening to the radio on the way home, I like his description of some woman [ex-Sun editor, now very high in the organisation] who works for Murdoch - "An infected pustule on the arse of humanity."
Good description of anyone who works for Murdoch.
S
|
|
|
|
Post by Chester PB on Jan 16, 2023 12:38:55 GMT
I still believe it's time for a DNA test on both of Diana's sons to confirm (or otherwise) Charles's input. In an ordinary family somebody would have got this done years ago and lived with the result.
|
|
|
|
Post by willien on Jan 16, 2023 13:59:55 GMT
No they would not. Ethical medics do not do paternity tests on whim and even by the early 70s a UK court ruled that a "father" could not require a paternity test to be performed on his alleged son. The courts reasoning being their first duty to was the child and a paternity test could provide no benefit to the child only potential financial harm. The child was the son of the man's (by now estranged) wife and therefor paternity was presumed until proved otherwise.
|
|
|
|
Post by dreampolice on Jan 16, 2023 17:10:49 GMT
No they would not. Ethical medics do not do paternity tests on whim and even by the early 70s a UK court ruled that a "father" could not require a paternity test to be performed on his alleged son. The courts reasoning being their first duty to was the child and a paternity test could provide no benefit to the child only potential financial harm. The child was the son of the man's (by now estranged) wife and therefor paternity was presumed until proved otherwise. I suppose they could all have gone on The Jeremy Kyle show. He did them for fun. Or was it just lie detector tests? Perhaps they each could’ve done one of those. (Was going to add a smilie but can’t find them when typing from my phone) It could have been Harry’s first foray into the trash TV he seems to like. |
|
|
|
Post by MJB on Jan 16, 2023 17:36:35 GMT
I worry about what some people think is ordinary or normal.
|
|
|
|
Post by dreampolice on Jan 16, 2023 17:49:49 GMT
Listening to the radio on the way home, I like his description of some woman [ex-Sun editor, now very high in the organisation] who works for Murdoch - "An infected pustule on the arse of humanity." Good description of anyone who works for Murdoch. S Rebekah Brooks by any chance? |
|
|
|
Post by mick on Jan 16, 2023 21:46:59 GMT
I still believe it's time for a DNA test on both of Diana's sons to confirm (or otherwise) Charles's input. In an ordinary family somebody would have got this done years ago and lived with the result. Why do you assume that they haven’t? Mick |
|
........ 
